The picture is very different for women (Figure 3), as the vast majority are out of the labor force both at baseline and at the end of their life cycle in 2018 (71%).
The public sector remains the main employer for women over the life cycle. Indeed, 12% of women at baseline were employed in the public sector, a share that has slightly grown over the life cycle. The life cycle analysis shows that the out of labor force status for women is very persistent: only 3%, 2%, and 1% of women out of the labor force in 1998, 2006, and 2012 respectively, managed to transition to the public sector by the following round of the ELMPS survey.
On the other hand, transitions from out of the labor force to the private informal sector or to unemployment are more likely to occur. Among women out of the labor force in 1998, 2006, and 2012, respectively 15%, 6% and 10% transitioned to the private informal sector, while 3%, 4% and 2% transitioned to unemployment by the following survey round.
Transitions out of the public sector are rare, though we observe women dropping out of the labor force as they aged over our 20-year window. Finally, we observe large percentages of women transitioning from the informal private sector to leaving the labor force over the life cycle: 41%, 64%, and 55% of women informally employed in the private sector in 1998, 2006, and 2012, respectively, dropped out of the labor force in the following wave.
Implications for Post-Pandemic
The analysis presented herein provides important insights on how to address momentous challenges posed by the ongoing pandemic. The cross-sectional stock analysis shows that both men and women experienced an increase in economic inactivity over the years. Therefore, the major disruptions associated with the pandemic further exacerbate pre-existing trends, putting additional pressure on a highly segmented labor market. Segmentation in the Egyptian labor market is striking across multiple dimensions: the gender and the sectoral dimensions. The hefty reliance of the Egyptian economy on public sector employment, in particular for women, the small size of the private formal sector, the large and increasing private informal sector, and the very low participation of women in the labor market are all major challenges that make the Egyptian labor market less resilient in absorbing the negative effects of the pandemic.
However, there are certainly several lessons that can be learnt from this analysis. Importantly, we note that education plays a key role in shaping individuals’ outcomes when it comes to better labor market transitions. For instance, better educated individuals are found to be more likely to transition out of the informal private sector into the formal sector, be it in the public or private sectors, and out of inactivity or unemployment into employment. Moreover, better educated women and men are found to be more likely to have formal sector jobs to start, as opposed to the least educated who are more likely to be employed informally. Given that informal workers are typically more vulnerable and bear more severe consequences associated with shocks, safety nets need to be designed to better target these vulnerable workers. The pandemic brought once again to the policy front the necessity to undertake key essential labor market reforms such as the necessity to boost and support job creation in the private formal sector and to design policies favoring women’s participation in the labor market including the provision of childcare services, the promotion of female friendly working environment, and potentially imposing hiring quotas for women.
The pandemic also calls for high-frequency labor market data to assess the impact of the pandemic on labor markets. To date, high-frequency phone surveys are the most reliable data source to study the impact of COVID-19 on labor markets in developing countries (Hoogeveen, and Lopez-Acevedo, 2021, Krafft, Assaad, and Marouani, 2021a; Krafft, Assaad, and Marouani, 2021b; Krafft, Assaad, and Marouani, 2021c; Krafft, Assaad, and Marouani, 2022). However, phone surveys come with their own caveats. For one, these surveys were conducted only post-pandemic, which means that one can only control for pre-existing outcomes through self-reported retrospective information. Another challenge economists face by design when using phone surveys is the selection of phone survey respondents, which are typically not representative of the whole population. Representative longitudinal panel data address both these concerns and are indeed necessary to understand labor market outcomes during and in the aftermath of the pandemic.
*This article was originally published on the Economic Research Forum (ERF) website.